<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Our Social Times &#187; social media monitoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/tag/social-media-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oursocialtimes.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Consultancy &#38; Events &#124; Inbound Marketing Consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social CRM: The Official Buzzword of 2010</title>
		<link>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/09/social-crm-the-official-buzzword-of-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/09/social-crm-the-official-buzzword-of-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Brynley-Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Monitoring Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social CRM solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oursocialtimes.com/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If 2009 was the breakthrough year for social media monitoring, then social CRM is most definitely the buzzword of 2010. I suppose it&#8217;s only logical that, once companies have started listening to customers, learning all about their tastes and interests and finding out who their friends are, the next question the CEO is going to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="Social CRM" src="http://img.worldcarfans.com/2005/3/large/5050328.001.Mini9L.jpg" alt="Using Social CRM to keep your customers satisfied" width="730" height="542" /></p>
<p>If 2009 was the breakthrough year for <a title="social media monitoring" href="http://www.monitoring-social-media.com">social media monitoring</a>, then <strong>social CRM</strong> is most definitely the buzzword of 2010. I suppose it&#8217;s only logical that, once companies have started listening to customers, learning all about their tastes and interests and finding out who their friends are, the next question the CEO is going to ask is: &#8220;So, how are we going to USE all this data?&#8221;</p>
<p>Social CRM is seen as the answer, but that simple term belies a panoply of troublesome issues that companies are going to have to overcome before the &#8220;social&#8221; and &#8220;CRM&#8221; can truly be integrated. Imagine, for a moment, that you&#8217;re the CEO of a national car dealership&#8230; First off, how can you track and store the millions of conversations going on around the world, or (much harder) in a specific town? How do you know that @snoop_dog5 is, in fact, John Dixon of 5 New Way, Cambridge, who bought a top-of-the-range BMW from your company last year? How do you capture that forum conversation about optional extras that BMW drivers most desire? What tools and solutions should you be using and, critically, which department of your organisation should be driving your social CRM strategy?</p>
<p>The first of these question is the easiest one. There are hundreds of <a title="social media monitoring" href="http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2009/11/top-5-budget-social-media-monitoring-tools/">social media monitoring</a> solutions on the market and they are all seeking to either integrate with existing CRM solutions (such as <a title="salesforce" href="http://www.salesforce.com">Salesforce</a> or Oracle&#8217;s <a title="siebel" href="http://landingpad.oracle.com/webapps/dialogue/ns/dlgwelcome.jsp?p_ext=Y&amp;p_dlg_id=6759591&amp;src=6652659&amp;Act=15&amp;sckw=EMEAMK08051877MPP011.GCM.8034.110.crm.br">Siebel</a>) or develop their own CRM features. Somewhat predictably many are also being acquired by CRM companies). So you really need to be looking for a top-of-the-range monitoring solution that integrates nicely with your existing CRM solution. Alternatively you could migrate to a new CRM solution that does social better. Of course, that&#8217;s not going to be easy.</p>
<p>The issue of identifying your customers within the socialmediasphere is rapidly becoming less daunting than it first appears. Alongside social media monitoring, the social data mining industry is booming and there are lots of innovative companies &#8211; such as Dan Martell&#8217;s <a title="flowtown" href="http://www.flowtown.com">Flowtown</a> &#8211; which can analyse your database and, for a fee, identify the social media accounts (Twitter, Facebook etc.) of your customers. If you&#8217;re looking for new customers, there are equally clever companies, like Chase McMichael&#8217;s <a title="infinigraph" href="http://www.infinigraph.com">Infinigraph</a>, that track social media engagements around specific industries or topics and enable you to connect with people who are likely to be interested in what you&#8217;re offering. This isn&#8217;t CRM as we know it. If anything  it&#8217;s <em>predictive</em> CRM. As Chase points out, many of the conversations people have about your products never mention your company or related keywords (it&#8217;s an inherent failure of keyword-based monitoring), so contextual monitoring has a major role to play in social CRM.</p>
<p>Although many don&#8217;t, lots of the leading monitoring solutions enable companies to record and store the conversations they find. The fear of conversation overload is genuine, but usually exaggerated. At our London monitoring Bootcamp earlier this year, Giles Palmer (CEO, <a title="Brandwatch" href="http://www.brandwatch.com">Brandwatch</a>) explained how one major client received 100,000 mentions over a 6 month period, but that only 4500 were worth reviewing and less than 2% required a response. That&#8217;s manageable within a CRM system.</p>
<p>When it comes to choosing  tools and solutions &#8211; while you might find your monitoring/CRM solution enables you to listen, monitor, analyse, respond and store your social media engagements, the chances are it won&#8217;t work for ALL your objectives. Even the best monitoring tools aren&#8217;t as good as TweetDeck or Hootsuite for engaging in real-time conversations and managing multiple Twitter accounts.  You&#8217;ll probably need to accommodate some third party solutions within your social CRM strategy.</p>
<p>Possibly the hardest question for anyone implementing a social CRM strategy is &#8220;who should be driving it?&#8221; Social CRM has the potential to impact heavily on sales, marketing, communications, research, development AND strategy, so there are endless possibilities for inter-departmental scuffling and territorial hot potatoes. To help companies overcome these issues, Accenture helpfully published a <a title="social CRM report" href="http://www.accenture.com/Global/Services/By_Industry/Electronics_and_High_Tech/R_and_I/Social-CRM.htm">social CRM report</a> earlier this year that, rather unsurprisingly, suggests you hire in a Management Consultant to help you work through this thorny issue. If it&#8217;s anything like the adoption of social media &#8211; which, in order to succeed, requires patience and enthusiasm in equal measure &#8211; I would suggest allowing the team that&#8217;s most committed to making it work to drive your social CRM strategy.</p>
<p>So, implementing social CRM isn&#8217;t going to be a bed of roses. Equally, however, it&#8217;s likely to be easier than we might fear. The hardest bit (as with social media in general) will be convincing the nay-sayers that there&#8217;s value in it. Until we can measure ROI end-to-end, from Tweet to receipt, the question of value will continue to hamper progress. In the end I suspect that this in itself will be the greatest hurdle to the successful adoption of social CRM within companies.</p>
<p><em><strong>We&#8217;re going to be discussing Social CRM in San Francisco on 17th September at </strong></em><a title="social email marketing" href="http://socialmediamarketing.co.uk/socialemail/"><em><strong>Social Email Marketing</strong></em></a><em><strong>. We&#8217;re also going to be looking at the integration of social media monitoring solutions and Social CRM at </strong></em><a title="monitoring boston" href="http://www.monitoringsocialmedia.co.uk/boston/"><em><strong>Monitoring Social Media (Boston)</strong></em></a><em><strong>, </strong></em><a title="monitoring san francisco" href="http://www.monitoringsocialmedia.co.uk/sanfrancisco"><em><strong>Monitoring Social Media (San Franscisco)</strong></em></a><em><strong> and </strong></em><a title="monitoring new york" href="http://www.monitoringsocialmedia.co.uk/newyork"><em><strong>Monitoring Social Media (New York) </strong></em></a><em><strong>later this year. See all our </strong></em><a title="social media marketing events" href="http://www.socialmediamarketing.co.uk"><em><strong>social media marketing events</strong></em></a><em><strong>.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/09/social-crm-the-official-buzzword-of-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Flawed Influence Measurement Better Than No Influence Measurement?</title>
		<link>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/08/is-flawed-measurement-better-than-no-measurement/</link>
		<comments>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/08/is-flawed-measurement-better-than-no-measurement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Brynley-Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influencers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oursocialtimes.com/?p=1017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just spotted the bit in LinkedIn Groups that identifies &#8220;Top Influencers this week&#8221;. In the Connected Marketing Network Group I&#8217;m apparently the Top Influencer this week. The fact is though, I&#8217;m the Manager for that Group so I add lots of comments and generally hang out there a lot. On the other hand, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 440px"><img title="Influence" src="http://www.gameguru.in/images/shigeru-miyamoto-time-2.jpg" alt="Shigero Miyamoto - One of the Times 100 most influential people of the year" width="430" height="320" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Shigero Miyamoto - One of the Time&#39;s 100 most influential people of the year</p></div>
<p>I just spotted the bit in LinkedIn Groups that identifies &#8220;Top Influencers this week&#8221;. In the <a title="Connected Marketing" href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?mostPopular=&amp;gid=90671">Connected Marketing Network Group</a> I&#8217;m apparently the Top Influencer this week. The fact is though, I&#8217;m the Manager for that Group so I add lots of comments and generally hang out there a lot. On the other hand, there are members who post much more insightful comments and who are certainly (in real life) far more influential than me.</p>
<p>At our Social Media Monitoring Bootcamp in London in March, Philip Sheldrake ridiculed the influence calculations of Twitter monitoring solution <a title="Klout" href="http://www.klout.com">Klout</a> &#8211; highlighting how they were calculating influence based on what they could, not what actually reflected the real nature and complexity of &#8220;influence&#8221;. The same seems to be the case for LinkedIn: the number of posts you make is no reflection of how influential you are.  It might indicate how committed, networked or bored a person is, but<em> not</em> how much they are influencing people.</p>
<p>This raises the obvious question, is a flawed measurement better than no measurement? Or are we just trying to ascribe value to something far too nebulous, fuelled perhaps by the personal vanity of people (like me) who love to be defined as &#8220;influential&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong><em>We&#8217;ll be talking about this more at </em></strong><a title="social media monitoring conference" href="http://www.monitoringsocialmedia.co.uk/boston/"><strong><em>Monitoring Social Media Boston</em></strong></a><strong><em>, </em></strong><a title="social media monitoring" href="http://www.monitoringsocialmedia.co.uk/sanfrancisco/"><strong><em>San Francisco</em></strong></a><strong><em>, </em></strong><a title="social media monitoring event" href="http://www.monitoringsocialmedia.co.uk/newyork/"><strong><em>New York</em></strong></a><strong><em>, </em></strong><a title="social media monitoring event" href="http://www.monitoringsocialmedia.co.uk/london/"><strong><em>London</em></strong></a><strong><em> and Paris. Hope you can make one of them!</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><br />
</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/08/is-flawed-measurement-better-than-no-measurement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Reasons to Monitor Social Media</title>
		<link>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/07/five-reasons-to-monitor-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/07/five-reasons-to-monitor-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Brynley-Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oursocialtimes.com/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Social Media Marketing 2010 (San Francisco) on Thursday, Maria Ogneva from Attensity gave an excellent introduction to social media monitoring (see my Social Media Marketing event summary, which includes her presentation). In addition to setting out the ideal process for monitoring &#8211; listen, analyse, relate, act &#8211; and highlighting the need to monitor your own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At <a title="social media marketing conference" href="http://www.socialmediamarketing.co.uk/sanfrancisco">Social Media Marketing 2010</a> (San Francisco) on Thursday, Maria Ogneva from <a title="Attensity" href="http://www.attensity.com/">Attensity</a> gave an excellent introduction to social media monitoring (see my <a title="social media marketing event" href="http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/07/social-media-marketing-2010-san-francisco-story-of-the-day/">Social Media Marketing</a> event summary, which includes her presentation). In addition to setting out the ideal process for monitoring &#8211; listen, analyse, relate, act &#8211; and highlighting the need to monitor your own response to monitoring (there&#8217;s no point doing it unless you act on the information you&#8217;re gathering) she suggested there are 5 primary reasons why businesses monitor social media. I&#8217;m sure there are more, but it was refreshing to see a nice clear list &#8211; so here they are, with my own notes added:</p>
<h2>Awareness</h2>
<p>This is much more relevant for brands than SME&#8217;s. Awareness needs to be gauged against your competitors and it might include monitoring sentiment, share of voice or share of conversation. Ever thought a Tweet without a link is wasted? Not if your goal is awareness.</p>
<h2>Traffic</h2>
<p>Seeing how many people you&#8217;re directing to your website from social networks is a very sensible goal, though most businesses will be more interested in gaining traffic en route to 3 (below). One interesting question is where it&#8217;s best to channel your traffic? You might actually be better building traffic on a social network, if that site is better equipped to elicit a positive action (i.e. engagement) from your readers.</p>
<h2>Conversion</h2>
<p>Tracking how your interventions with potential customers via social media are leading to click thru&#8217;s and sales conversions brings social media monitoring centre stage in your web metrics set up. Adding <a title="Google Analytics" href="http://analytics.google.com">Google Analytics</a> to Facebook is a nice way of doing this on the cheap, and services like <a title="Hubspot" href="http://www.hubspot.com">Hubspot</a> offer a neat end-to-end service for tacking social media leads through to conversations.</p>
<h2>Engagement</h2>
<p>Gauging how active your customers are in actively responding to your social media activities can be a measure of (a) the quality of the content you&#8217;re sharing (b) how you&#8217;re presenting it and (c) how close your customers feel to you. You still need to figure out which it is, but benchmarking the number interactions you&#8217;re generating is a good start.</p>
<h2>Research</h2>
<p>Social media monitoring tools can be excellent for gaining real-time insight into products or services you&#8217;re offering. You can also set up alerts and searches to ensure you&#8217;re up-to-date on industry news and trends. You can get a long way with a few good Twitter searches and Google Alerts, but for comprehensive and immediate results that allow analysis and reporting, you&#8217;ll need a pay-for service.</p>
<p><strong><em>We&#8217;ll be running a series of conferences on social media monitoring later this year. Details will be published on our </em></strong><a title="social media monitoring" href="http://www.monitoring-social-media.com"><strong><em>Social Media Monitoring </em></strong></a><strong><em>homepage in the coming weeks.</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/07/five-reasons-to-monitor-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
